5 Answers »

1. josh s on May 31st, 2010 at 12:51 am:

   they seem to get these thing rights you know.

2. Keith S on May 31st, 2010 at 1:23 am:

   hahahahahahaha! are you fkng nuts,pus*s*y sells ! who is sinclair….

3. rocky on May 31st, 2010 at 1:26 am:

   It already HAS been reported by tabloid journalism, by Globe Magazine. They stated, “Sinclair failed a disputed lie detector test over his initial gay claims about Obama.” This is directly quoted from the May 19, 2008 issue of the magazine that featured the story. It is apparent that even the Globe, who agreed to publish this story, has stated that Sinclair failed the polygraph test. Though the Globe wanted this story because it is “newsworthy,” they must state obvious and critical facts as well.

   The National Enquirer reported the Edwards story based on the facts it had available, which turned out to be true. Don’t count on them to do a story about Sinclair based totally on fallacious allegations.

4. getreal on May 31st, 2010 at 1:52 am:

   There are many investigating it. After following it for months I believe it is true. (The answers below are part of a calculated misinformation effort in spreading the idea that Sinclair “failed” his polygraph.)

   Sinclair did NOT fail it. He passed with flying colors. On June 18 at the National Press Club in Washington DC, Sinclair made a presentation –covered by over 100 members of the press– in which he presented tangible evidence…names, cell phone numbers. The polygraph results were presented (passed) and the polygraph administrator’s name and credentials were presented. The main stream media is treating it as radioactive…it will take an Enquirer to blow it open ( just as in Edwards case)

   The stakes are tremendously high here. The forces at work in keeping this story buried are immense and far reaching, funded by huge money and foreign and extreme left wing concerns– as well as a stupidly smitten media intoxicated by the idea that they will be a part of history in helping put the first black president in office. ( forget he is a crooked pol!)

   They want to erase his crooked past in Chicago politics, his racist and anti-American dealings and statements, his complete lack of ANY accomplishment and his drug purchasing and usage in recent years. He has not presented any professional or personal records…he has “lost” his Harvard thesis ( no doubt a marxist sympathetic writing) He voted “present” 130 times while in the Illinois state legislature rather than take a position of yes or no conviction.

   At best, Obama is a do-nothing empty suit that can read scripted teleprompters written for him by puppetmasters–at worse, he is a law-breaking opportunist, socialist and immoral hypocrite.

   I expect the National Enquirer is all it and are looking for more incontrovertible evidence before they publish anything, Remember they caught Edwards’ red-handed, they got photos.

   Sinclair’s allegations are from 1999. They need corroborating evidence. It is a process.

5. Mark W on May 31st, 2010 at 2:42 am:

   I don’t know what getreal’s been smoking, but I want some…

   Sinclair didn’t pass any polygraph with flying colors. At the very best there was some computerized score that said he was marginally telling the truth on one of the questions. By every other measure they used, he unquestionably failed. Note: he’s had months in which to take another polygraph. Why hasn’t he taken one yet??

   The National Enquirer had solid evidence for Edwards’s infidelity. All anyone has for Sinclair’s story is Sinclair’s own words, and they are words of a lifelong conman and multiply convicted criminal (all for crimes of deception) and of someone who is currently under indictment for fraud in Delaware and a fugitive from justice in Colorado not to mention the other criminal complaints against him in Florida and Texas, and so on. Sinclair has a decades-long criminal record which he is still adding to today.

   Four years ago he claimed he was terminally ill to the Colorado authorities — he’s looking mighty healthy for a man four years on his death bed — and he’s continually lied about his past until confronted with evidence by those looking into his sordid past.

   As for his joke of a press conference at the National Press Club. Anyone can rent out a room at the NPC. It means absolutely nothing. And there weren’t even close to 100 journalists at the press conference. There were a couple of dozen, mostly from overseas, and none from even a semi-reputable US news organization. After the PC, Sinclair was arrested on an outstanding Delaware arrest warrant that had been issued months before and was only in effect for up to 150 miles from where it was issued, in Delaware. Washington DC was within that 150 mile limit and thus the arrest was perfectly legal. As for a conspiracy, why would Delaware issue an arrest warrant only valid up to 150 miles away when Sinclair lived in Minnesota? How were they supposed to know he would travel to Washington several months after the warrant was issued??

   Anyway, to answer the question. I would bet the National Enquirer has looked into the Sinclair story and seen everything that everyone else with half-a-brain sees — not a lick of evidence, just the claims of a proven liar, felon, drug dealer, and conman. I doubt they will be wasting any more of their time with Sinclair while they have more credible stories to follow up, like the alien baby born to an unspecified Hollywood starlet last week.